Analyzing the Implications for the Crypto Market: Paul Grewal’s Involvement in SEC vs. Ethereum
SEC’s Attempt to Open Up the Dollar Industry Faces Uncertainty with Ethereum ETFs
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) plan to enter the world of cryptocurrency with the approval of Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) is now in question. While the SEC recently approved 10 spot bitcoin ETFs after a long battle, it seems to be hesitating when it comes to ETH ETFs due to legal concerns. Let’s take a closer look at the situation.
Unlike its approach with spot bitcoin ETFs, the SEC is not actively engaging with potential issuers of ETH ETFs. Analysts James Seyffart and Eric Balchunas have pointed out this glaring contrast. They note that the SEC has recently delayed the approval of several spot Ethereum ETFs, raising doubts about whether they will be approved by the expected date of May 23. This delay has also caused a decrease in investor confidence in the investment vehicle.
Paul Grewal Challenges the SEC’s Stance on ETH
Paul Grewal, in a series of posts, has addressed some of the misconceptions surrounding Ethereum and its eligibility for ETFs. Grewal emphasizes the significant role ETH has played in the crypto market since its inception in 2015, highlighting its widespread adoption and importance to millions of Americans. Before becoming SEC Chair, Grewal refers to statements made by senior SEC officials, including Gary Gensler, that classify ETH as a commodity rather than a security.
Furthermore, Grewal points out that even SEC trial lawyers have compared ETH to Bitcoin, further solidifying its status as a commodity. He also highlights that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has classified ETH as a commodity and that ETH futures contracts have been traded on CFTC-regulated exchanges since 2021.
Grewal concludes his posts by asserting that ETH does not meet the criteria of the Howey test, which determines whether an asset is a security. He argues that even under the Howey test, ETH would not be considered a security. He urges the SEC to maintain its stance on ETH and avoid creating excuses to reject Ethereum ETF applications, emphasizing the need for fair and transparent rules for investors and the crypto market.
The Key Point of Contention
The SEC has delayed its decision on several applications, including those from Ark Invest, Hashdex, Grayscale Investments, and BlackRock Inc., regarding the approval of Ethereum ETFs. VanEck’s proposal is expected to receive a final decision on May 23.
The main issue causing the delay is the SEC’s hesitation in determining whether Ethereum should be classified as a security or a commodity. Sumit Roy from etf.com notes that while Ethereum exhibits characteristics of both, the SEC is reluctant to definitively classify it. Instead, the SEC may prefer to have legal clarity on the matter before making a decision.
The SEC is open to public comments regarding concerns related to market manipulation and fraud, echoing the issues that hindered the quick approval of spot bitcoin ETFs.
Despite recent volatility, with a 40% surge in price year-to-date but a downturn in the past week, with prices dropping below $3,300 and an overall decline of 12% in the last five days, sentiment towards Ethereum remains positive.
Tags:
Coinbase Exchange
Crypto Regulations