Survival of the Fittest: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Face Cost Pressure, Only the Strongest Will Prevail
The cryptocurrency market is abuzz with the introduction of Bitcoin spot ETFs, and according to Steven McClurg, Chief Investment Officer at Valkyrie Funds, this development is set to shake up the industry. McClurg predicts that fierce competition and high operational costs will lead to significant changes among ETF issuers by the end of the year.
McClurg highlights the tough situation that existing ETF issuers are facing. Out of the ten contenders, only seven or eight are expected to survive. The challenges come from both high operational costs and rivals who are cutting fees, making it difficult for struggling issuers to stay afloat.
To stay competitive in the ETF market, McClurg suggests that issuers need to have at least $100 million in assets under management. This will help them navigate the challenges posed by operational costs and the intense competition in the industry.
Since the Securities and Exchange Commission approved Bitcoin spot ETFs on January 10, there has been a surge in inflows into the sector. On the first day of trading alone, there were transactions worth $4.5 billion. Valkyrie, despite competing with industry giants like BlackRock and Fidelity, has shown commendable performance. While BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin ETF and Fidelity’s Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund crossed the $3 billion mark in assets under management within a month, Valkyrie, with around $123.7 million in assets as of February 8, may have a lower volume but is on track to break records.
However, the increased competition has led Valkyrie, along with other issuers, to make fee cuts in order to attract investors. Valkyrie has aligned its sponsor fee with industry norms at 0.25%.
McClurg warns about the profitability challenges that current ETF issuers face, particularly in terms of operational costs and sustainability. He advises issuers to accumulate assets in the millions to ensure the longevity of Bitcoin spot ETFs, given the complex operational costs and cutthroat competition among issuers.
As McClurg’s predictions indicate, the landscape for ETF issuers is challenging. It is important for issuers to navigate these challenges and secure their position in the market.